Latest

Our latest articles, data updates, and announcements

Data Insight

A bar graph illustrating the decline in oil spills from tankers over several decades. The vertical axis represents the amount of oil spilled, measured in tonnes, ranging from 0 to 700,000 tonnes. The horizontal axis indicates the years from 1970 to 2024. A significant drop in spills is visible, with peaks in the 1970s and 1980s, where more than 300,000 tonnes were spilled each year. Notably, a bar is labeled indicating that 10,000 tonnes were spilled in 2024. An annotation points out the Sanchi incident off the coast of China in 2018. The data source for the graph is indicated as ITOPF, with a date of 2025. The overall message emphasizes a dramatic decrease in oil spills from tankers over recent decades.

Oil spills from tankers have fallen to less than one-thirtieth of the levels seen in the 1970s

We’ve all seen the dramatic images of vast parts of the ocean caked in oil; birds and other wildlife stuck in the thick, dark liquid. These spills are both environmentally damaging and expensive to clean up.

As the chart shows, in the 1970s, over 300,000 tonnes of oil were spilled from oil tankers in most years. By the 1980s and 1990s, this had dropped, but the annual average was still over 100,000 tonnes.

These losses have fallen dramatically since the millennium. Last year, 10,000 tonnes were spilled, less than one-thirtieth of the amount lost in a typical year in the 1970s.

This decline has occurred despite global oil production and trade increasing dramatically.

We’ve just updated our charts on oil spills; explore the latest data

Data Insight

The image displays a world map highlighting various countries based on the percentage of foreign aid as a part of their gross national income for the year 2023. The map features several colors indicating different categories: countries receiving foreign aid that constitutes more than 20% of their national income are shaded in dark brown, while those receiving less than 20% are light blue. 

Seven countries are specifically marked in dark brown: Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, South Sudan, Burundi, and the Central African Republic. Countries that did not receive aid are shown in white. The map provides a visual overview of how foreign aid impacts national income in these regions, with a legend clarifying the meaning of the color codes.

Data source for this information is the OECD, dated 2025. The image is attributed to "Our World in Data" under the Creative Commons BY license.

Foreign aid can be a large share of a country’s income during times of conflict or humanitarian crisis

Many countries receive some foreign aid, but it typically accounts for just a few percent of their income. But during periods of conflict, crisis, or natural disaster, foreign aid forms a large part of some countries’ economy.

The map shows the countries where aid was more than one-fifth of national income in 2023 (the latest year of data available). This included Yemen, Syria, and the Central African Republic, which experienced continued conflict, and Ukraine, which received humanitarian aid following the Russian invasion.

Since aid is often given during periods of acute fragility and humanitarian crises, the countries on this list change a lot from year to year. If you look at the trend for Haiti, for example, you can see a spike in aid after the devastating earthquake that hit Port-au-Prince in 2010.

During these events, aid often plays a crucial role in providing basic resources and support for countries trying to rebuild.

Explore data on who gives foreign aid, who receives it, and how this has changed over time

Article

The image features a minimalist design with a light green section on the left and a pale yellow background on the right. There are three horizontal arrows in gray pointing to the right — these are a representation of how the data on global incomes has changed with the. World Bank's update. There is a further, bold arrow that is larger — this is a representation in the change in the International Poverty Line.

$3 a day: A new poverty line has shifted the World Bank’s data on extreme poverty. What changed, and why?

In June 2025, the World Bank increased its extreme poverty estimates by 125 million people. This doesn’t mean the world has gotten poorer: it reflects a new, higher International Poverty Line of $3 a day, up from $2.15.

Data Insight

This graphic illustrates the distribution of the labor force across different sectors—agriculture, industry, and services—based on income levels of countries in 2023.

On the left, there is a stacked bar representing low-income countries, where 59% of the workforce is in agriculture, 10% in industry, and 31% in services. Next, the lower-middle-income group shows a breakdown of 40% in agriculture, 23% in industry, and 37% in services. The upper-middle-income countries have 21% in agriculture, 28% in industry, and 51% in services. Finally, in high-income countries, only 3% of the labor force is in agriculture, with 23% in industry and 74% in services.

The title highlights the trend that higher-income countries have fewer agricultural workers and a greater proportion involved in industry and services. The footer indicates the data source is the International Labor Organization (2025)

In low-income countries, most people work in farming; in richer countries, they work in services

As countries get richer, the type of work that people do changes a lot.

The chart breaks down the workforce by sector by country income groups. In most low-income countries, a majority of people work in agriculture. People grow their own food, get a surplus to sell to others, or produce commodities that they can export overseas.

In comparison, fewer people work in farming in middle- and high-income countries. People start to move to industrial and service jobs instead.

In rich countries, three-quarters of workers are employed in services, compared to just 3% in agriculture.

There are several drivers of this. Agricultural productivity tends to increase as countries get richer (and they gain access to better seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, and land). This means fewer family members must work on the farm to produce the same — or more — income.

At the same time, many industrial and service jobs pay more, so people are incentivized to move out of farming to higher-paying roles when they become available. This transition has been a key driver of economic growth and poverty reduction for many countries.

Read my article on why improvements in agricultural productivity are important to reduce poverty

Data Insight

A horizontal bar chart comparing the estimated nuclear weapon stockpiles of various countries in 2025. Each bar represents a different country, with the length corresponding to the number of nuclear warheads. 

- Russia has the highest stockpile, with 4,299 warheads.
- The United States follows with 3,700 warheads.
- China has an estimated 600 warheads.
- France is shown with 290 warheads.
- The United Kingdom has 225 warheads.
- India is estimated to have 180 warheads.
- Pakistan has around 170 warheads.
- Israel's stockpile is estimated at 90 warheads.
- North Korea has the smallest estimated stockpile at 50 warheads.

The chart is titled "Which countries have nuclear weapons?" and includes a note that these estimates exclude retired warheads queued for dismantlement. The data source is the Federation of American Scientists, indicating that the estimates are based on publicly available information, historical records, and occasional leaks. The image is credited to "Our World in Data" and employs a CC BY license.

Which countries have nuclear weapons, and how many?

As conflicts break out across the world, the threat of nuclear war is never far from many people’s minds.

One of the first questions we need to answer to better understand the risks of nuclear weapons is: which countries have them, and in what quantity? The chart shows estimates of national stockpiles in 2025.

The exact number of warheads is secret, so these are some of the best estimates based on publicly available information, historical records, and occasional leaks.

Nine countries are thought to have nuclear weapons today, but over 80% of warheads are held by just two: Russia and the United States.

While the number of countries that possess nuclear weapons has never been higher, the total number of warheads and tests being carried out is lower than they were a few decades ago.

Read our colleague Max Roser’s article on why nuclear war is a key concern of our generation

Data Insight

A graph illustrating the decline in negative views of homosexuality across several wealthy countries from 1984 to 2022. The title states that “Negative views of homosexuality have dropped in Western Europe and the US” 

The countries are the United States, Spain, Great Britain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Each line shows the percentage of respondents in each country who believe that homosexuality is rarely or never justifiable, represented by scores of 1 to 4 on a scale from 1 to 10. 

In 1984, the United States had the highest percentage at 75%, followed by Spain at 70%, Great Britain at 61%, Sweden at 48%, and the Netherlands at 34%. By 2022, the percentages had decreased significantly: the United States to 28%, Spain to 19%, Great Britain to 15%, Sweden to 9%, and the Netherlands to 6%. 

The data source is listed as Integrated Values Surveys (2024). The chart is CC BY Our World in Data.

Homophobic attitudes have fallen in Western Europe and the United States

Forty years ago, public views about homosexuality were extremely negative in many rich countries. As the chart shows, back in 1984, one in three Dutch people believed homosexuality was “never or rarely justified”. In Spain and Great Britain, that view was held by the majority. Perhaps most strikingly, three-quarters of Americans thought the same.

Since then, levels of discrimination have plummeted. Today, the share of people in these countries who think that homosexuality is “never or rarely justified” makes up a shrinking minority. That’s good news — everyone should be free to decide for themselves who they are attracted to.

It might sound odd today to ask whether someone else’s sexuality is justified. But that’s how the long-running World Values Survey phrased it when they began decades ago. Keeping the phrasing consistent helps show how attitudes have changed, but the fact that it may sound outdated now is, in itself, a reflection of how much has changed.

Explore responses to this question in more than a hundred countries

Data Insight

The image presents a bar chart illustrating the percentage of new cars sold globally that were electric, including both fully battery-electric and plug-in hybrids, with data projected for 2024. The chart shows a selection of countries and regions from highest to lowest percentage. 

- Norway leads with 92%.
- Sweden follows with 58%.
- China shows 48%.
- The United Kingdom and Switzerland each have 28%.
- The European Union has 21%.
- Canada has 17%.
- Australia is at 13%.
- The United States has 10%.
- South Korea registers 9%.
- Brazil is represented at 6%.
- Japan stands at 3%.
- India is at 2%. 

The data source cited at the bottom is the International Energy Agency's Global EV Outlook 2025.

What share of new cars in your country are electric?

As someone who studies the transition to low-carbon energy, I am always on the lookout for electric cars in everyday life. I like to see how common they are, and it has been exciting to see their prominence grow on the roads in the UK.

Last year, more than one in five new cars sold globally were electric. But how does this vary worldwide? This share is shown across a selection of countries in the chart (more are available here).

Norway leads the world by a long way, with almost all new cars there being electric. China is another standout, with nearly half of new sales.

At the bottom, you can see that electric cars are still relatively rare in countries like Japan, Brazil, and India.

In most countries, greenhouse gas emissions from transport have either grown or, at best, stagnated in the last decade. Accelerating the transition to electric vehicles will be crucial to pushing emissions downwards.

Note that “electric” here includes fully-electric and plug-in hybrid cars; you can see the contribution of each here.

Explore data on electric car sales and stocks across countries in our latest update →

Article

Death rates from cardiovascular disease have fallen dramatically — what were the breakthroughs behind this?

Over a century of progress in surgery, drugs, prevention, and emergency response has driven down death rates from heart disease and stroke.

Data Insight

The image presents a line graph illustrating the share of electricity generated from fossil fuels and renewables in the Netherlands from 1985 to 2024. 

The horizontal axis marks the years, starting at 1985 on the left and progressing to 2024 on the right. The vertical axis indicates the percentage of electricity generation, ranging from 0% to 100%. 

A brown line represents fossil fuels, which shows a gradual decline over the years, starting near 90% in 1985 and dropping sharply after 2015, approaching close to 40% by 2024. In contrast, a blue line illustrates renewables, showing a slow increase from nearly 0% in 1985 to a significant rise, crossing the fossil fuel line in 2024 to surpass it. 

The title notes the historic shift in Dutch electricity generation, indicating that for the first time, most electricity now comes from renewable sources. 

Data sources for the graph are attributed to Ember for the year 2025 and the EI Statistical Review of World Energy for 2024. The graph is licensed under CC BY.

Renewables have taken the lead in Dutch electricity production

For the first time, in 2024, more than half of the electricity produced in the Netherlands came from renewable sources, and almost all of it (45%) from solar and wind.

As the chart shows, this has been a sharp and recent shift. Even as recently as 2018, over 80% of Dutch electricity was generated by fossil fuels.

The Dutch government signed a national climate accord in 2019 that introduced more than 600 measures to accelerate the shift to low-carbon power. These included further stimulation of solar and wind energy, a rising carbon tax, and the closure of a major coal plant. A rapid surge in renewable electricity followed, with solar and wind growing from 14% to 45% of the electricity mix.

See how each source contributes to the Dutch electricity mix

Data Insight

The visual displays a stacked area chart titled "Number of European overseas colonies by colonizer," indicating the historical decline in the number of colonies held by European nations. The vertical axis represents the number of colonies, ranging from 0 to 100, while the horizontal axis spans from 1925 to 2022. 

The chart shows that in 1925, there were 97 colonies, predominantly held by France and the United Kingdom. A sudden drop in the number of colonies occurs around the 1960s, correlating with a period of rapid decolonization following World War II. There are annotations highlighting key information: "97 of the countries that are independent today were European colonies in 1925" and an explanation of the rapid decolonization. 

Data source: Bastian Becker (2023). Chart CC BY Our World in Data

A century ago, around half of today’s independent countries were European colonies

Just a century ago, many of today’s independent countries weren’t self-governing at all. They were colonies controlled by European countries from far away.

Modern European colonialism began in the 15th century, when Spain and Portugal established overseas empires. By the early 20th century, it had peaked: the United Kingdom and France dominated, and nearly 100 modern-day countries were under European control, mostly in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean.

As the chart shows, this changed rapidly after World War II. A wave of decolonization spread across the world, especially in the 1950s and 1960s. Colonies became independent countries, formed their own governments, joined international institutions, and started having their own voice in global decisions.

The decline of colonialism marked one of the biggest political shifts in modern history, from external rule to national sovereignty.

Read more about colonization and state capacity on our dedicated page

Data Insight

The image presents a grid of line graphs displaying the increase in household access to various amenities in the United States from 1860 to 2020. The title at the top states, "What did economic growth mean for US households?" 

In the top left panel, the data on average income, here measured by GDP per capita, tells us that the average American was 13 times poorer in 1860. 

The purple lines represent a very straightforward approach to measuring growth: each line tracks the share of households that have access to one specific good or service. Starting from the top, you see the rising provision of basic infrastructure like running water, flush toilets, and electric power. You can also see the increasing availability of communication technology from the radio to the TV to the Internet to mobile phones. And further down, you see the increasing availability of technologies that reduced the drudgery of work at home — vacuum cleaners, washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers.

Footnotes at the bottom provide data sources, including research by Horace Dediu, Comin, Hobijn, and GDP data from the Maddison Project Database.

Two ways of measuring 160 years of economic growth in the United States

Economic growth is easy to understand: it means that people have access to goods and services of increasing quantity and quality.

What is hard, however, is to measure economic growth. This chart shows two ways of doing this for US growth over the past 160 years.

The purple lines represent a straightforward approach: each line tracks the share of households with access to one specific good or service. Starting from the top, you see the rising provision of basic infrastructure like running water, flush toilets, and electric power. You can also see the increasing availability of communication technology: radios, TVs, the Internet, and mobile phones. And further down, you see the rise of technologies that reduced work at home: vacuum cleaners, washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers.

This approach is very concrete; it shows practical ways in which the production and consumption of specific goods increased over time. The downside is that it only captures a limited number of particular goods. Millions of goods and services are produced and consumed, and most are not recorded with such precision.

A way to measure how people’s access to the full range of goods and services changes is to measure people’s incomes. This way of measuring growth is shown in the top left panel. The data on average income, here measured by GDP per capita, tells us that the average American was 13 times poorer in 1860 than in 2022 (adjusted for inflation).

These two ways of measuring economic growth have pros and cons: one is concrete but not comprehensive, the other is comprehensive but quite abstract. If we want to understand what growth means for our societies, I find it helpful to combine them both.

If you want to know more about this — and see how the inequality of incomes can be factored in — you can read my article: “What is economic growth? And why is it so important?”

Article

Featured image

The world left its fight against tuberculosis unfinished — how can we complete the job?

If we get it right, the world could save more than 1.2 million lives every year.

Data Insight

This image is a line graph comparing per capita CO2 emissions in China and the United Kingdom from 1990 to 2022. The vertical axis represents emissions in tonnes per person, ranging from 0 to 14 tonnes, while the horizontal axis represents the years from 1990 to 2022.

There are two lines on the graph: one in blue for the United Kingdom and another in red for China. The blue line shows that UK emissions began around 12 tonnes per person in 1990, then displayed slight fluctuations but generally declined over the years, indicating a move away from coal. 

In contrast, the red line for China starts below 2 tonnes per person in 1990 and increases steadily over the years, matching the UK's emissions by 2022. 

Text annotations highlight that in the early 1990s, per capita emissions in the UK were six times those in China and that China's emission growth primarily stemmed from increased energy demand, largely powered by coal.

The data sources for this information are the Global Carbon Budget (2024) and UN World Population Prospects. The note specifies that the data refers to fossil emissions only, excluding land use and international transport. The image is credited under CC BY.

Per capita CO₂ emissions in China now match those in the United Kingdom

When I was born in the 1990s, the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United Kingdom were about six times higher than in China, but these trends have converged in my lifetime.

You can see this in the chart: in 2022, China’s per capita emissions matched those in the UK.

Once a country that ran on coal, the UK has closed its last coal plant. This has been the main driver of its emissions decline.

Meanwhile, rapid economic growth, powered mainly by coal, has ramped up emissions in China.

These emission numbers are adjusted for trade. Based on domestic production, China’s per capita emissions are much higher than the UK's. But since China is a net exporter of goods (and emissions) and the UK is a net importer, the gap closes when we adjust for consumption.

These emissions are based on domestic consumption and do not include international aviation or shipping, where Brits are likely to emit more.

There are many ways to compare national contributions to climate change; explore them here

Data Insight

This image presents a horizontal range chart titled "Anti-tobacco measures are expanding, but coverage remains patchy."

It shows the percentage of the world population covered by the World Health Organization's best practices for selected tobacco control policies, with data for 2007 and 2024.

Each policy has a corresponding horizontal bar indicating its coverage.

The chart includes a footnote indicating the reference year for taxation is 2008 and cites the data source as WHO, 2024. The chart is CC BY Our World in Data

Strong anti-tobacco measures are growing, but reach only a minority worldwide

Smokers are about 21 times more likely to die from lung cancer than people who never smoked, and they face increased risks from over a dozen other diseases. I know people who died from smoking: you probably do too.

In 2008, the World Health Organization created a set of tobacco control policies with different tiers, the highest of which are considered “best practices” — they are listed on the chart.

The chart also shows the share of the global population living in countries that had enacted these policies as of 2007 and 2024.

What surprised me is how recent most of these policies still are. In 2007, only a tiny share of the global population benefited from these policies. Since then, coverage has increased across all these measures, but most of them still reach less than half of the world's population.

What is the share of taxes on the retail price of a pack of cigarettes? See the data for each country

Article

Thumbnail for article on restoring the Demographic and Health Surveys

The Demographic and Health Surveys brought crucial data for more than 90 countries — without them, we risk darkness

Cuts to US aid could end the Demographic and Health Surveys. This would leave a massive gap in our understanding of global health, mortality, and development.

Data Insight

A line graph depicting GDP per capita from 1820 to 2022, with the vertical axis representing GDP in international dollars and the horizontal axis showing the years. Multiple colored lines represent different regions: 

- A purple line for "Western offshoots" (United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), showing the highest GDP per capita, peaking just above $60,000 in 2022.
- A dark blue line for "Western Europe," also showing significant growth and stabilizing around $50,000.
- A light blue line for "East Asia," indicating gradual growth.
- An orange line for "Eastern Europe," displaying a more moderate increase.
- A green line for the "Middle East and North Africa," showing slow growth throughout the years.
- A brown line for the "World" that climbs steadily.
- An olive line for "Latin America," with modest growth.
- A purple line for "South and Southeast Asia," showing the lowest GDP per capita.
- A teal line representing "Sub Saharan Africa," showing minimal gains.

Additional information indicates the data is sourced from Bolt and van Zanden's Maddison Project Database, with a note that it is expressed in international dollars based on 2011 prices. The graph is attributed to "Our World in Data" and is labeled with a Creative Commons license (CC BY).

Global inequality is the result of two centuries of uneven economic growth

For most of history, almost everyone everywhere was very poor. Hunger was common, half of the children died, and, as the chart shows, average incomes were low across all regions.

The chart also shows how people’s incomes have changed over the last two centuries. The chart highlights a stark divergence: while average incomes in every region have increased, the pace of this growth has varied enormously. Western Europe and the “Western Offshoots” (like the US and Australia) experienced early and sustained economic growth. Meanwhile, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia grew much more slowly.

Two hundred years ago, people in all regions were similarly poor. Today, the average incomes of people in Australia, the US, or Denmark are more than 15 times higher than those in Sub-Saharan Africa.

I wrote an article on how economic growth is possible and why it is important: “What is economic growth?” →

Data Insight

A line graph titled "Cereal yields in England and globally" illustrates the yields of wheat and barley over time, measured in tonnes per hectare. The horizontal axis represents the years from 1275 to 2023, while the vertical axis indicates yields ranging from 0 to 8 tonnes per hectare. 

Shown are wheat yields and barley yields in England and the global average.

Today's yields in England are approximately ten times higher than in the 16th century. Globally, yields have increased three-fold in the last six decades. 

The data sources cited at the bottom are "Broadberry et al. (2015), FAO, and others".

Rising yields, falling hunger

The Agricultural Revolution — the transition from hunting and gathering to farming — didn’t end hunger. That’s because more food didn’t mean more per person: it meant more people.

The English cleric Thomas Malthus predicted this would continue forever: food production would always be outpaced by population growth, making lasting progress against hunger impossible.

But at least since the mid-20th century, England has left mass hunger behind. How was this possible? How did English farmers prove Malthus wrong?

The chart shows one central part of the answer. For centuries, cereal yields in England — for staples like wheat and barley — were stuck at about 0.6 tonnes per hectare. That means farmers needed a plot of 100 meters by 100 meters to grow 600 kilograms of cereals per year. Hunger was widespread.

But this changed from the 17th century onward, accelerating a hundred years ago. In a dramatic transformation known as the Second Agricultural Revolution, farmers found ways to grow much more food on the same land.

Today, after four centuries of rising productivity, English farmers are growing about ten times more food on the same land than in the past. This has made it possible to increase food production faster than population growth, breaking England out of the “Malthusian Trap”.

The chart also shows that the world as a whole is changing in the same direction. Global average yields have tripled in the last six decades. Today, yields are already about five times higher than in England in the past. If yields continue to follow this trajectory, it would bring us much closer to the end of global hunger, while also sparing land for nature.

My colleague Hannah Ritchie wrote about how climate change might affect crop yields in the future

Data Insight

A line graph illustrates the trend of new HIV infections in children from 1990 to 2023. The vertical axis represents the number of new HIV cases, ranging from 0 to 600,000. The horizontal axis represents the years, spanning from 1990 to 2023.

In 2000, the peak shows 530,000 new HIV cases in children. A highlighted area, labeled "New infections averted due to PMTCT," indicates the number of cases prevented each year, demonstrating a gradual decrease in infections since then. The lowest section of the graph, colored in dark purple, represents the actual new HIV infections in children, while the upper section reflects infections prevented through prevention methods. An annotation notes that 230,000 cases are prevented each year due to these treatments.

The data source is the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, referencing 2024, with a copyright attribution of CC BY.

Every year, 230,000 children are spared from HIV thanks to treatments that reduce mother-to-child transmission

It’s hard to imagine many things that are more terrifying than your baby contracting HIV. This is the reality for around 130,000 families every year.

Just a few decades ago, this figure was over half a million. Most of these infections were passed on from mothers who had HIV themselves.

But the introduction of anti-retroviral (ART) drugs and other interventions has meant that most infections can be prevented. If the mother takes ART during pregnancy, it dramatically reduces the risk of passing on HIV. In some cases, giving ART to the baby in the first few weeks of life can help too.

In the chart, you can see this decline in new HIV infections in children. On top, you can see the huge number of cases estimated to have been averted thanks to these interventions; they amount to almost a quarter of a million cases every year.

Explore more of our work on HIV/AIDS in adults and children

Article

The image shows a map of the world, with each country colored depending of their World Bank income group classification in 2025/26

How does the World Bank classify countries by income?

The World Bank classifies countries into four income groups based on average income per person. This article explains how these groups are defined.

Data Insight

The graph illustrates the trend of trade as a percentage of GDP for China, the United States, and Germany from 1970 to 2023. 

China's trade as a share of GDP, represented by a thick brown line, starts at around 5% in 1970, increases steadily to approximately 64% around 2010, and then declines to 37% by 2023. 

In contrast, the United States, shown with a thin gray line, exhibits a more stable trend, beginning below 20% in 1970 and rising slightly to around 30% in 2023. 

Germany's trade as a share of GDP follows a varying path, starting near 45% in 1970, climbing to nearly 80% by 2023, and showing notable fluctuations throughout. 

Key data sources for this information include the World Bank and OECD, with a projected update scheduled for 2025. The visualization is licensed under CC BY.

Trade’s share of China’s economy is far below its 2006 peak — but still much higher than in the 1970–80s

Global trade has never been a bigger slice of the world economy. However, China, the country that most people think of as the export giant, has seen a decline in its trade-to-GDP ratio in the last 15 years.

The chart shows China’s trade in goods and services as a share of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In 1970, it was just 5%. Following Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, which opened China to market forces and international trade, this figure soared to 64% in 2006. But since then, it has fallen considerably, reaching 37% in 2023 — still far higher than before the 1990s. China's exports have grown in dollar terms, but its economy has expanded even faster, making trade a shrinking share of the whole.

While the 2008 financial crisis disrupted global trade, China’s trajectory also reflects the increase in domestic demand for its products. The decline in the trade-to-GDP ratio since 2006 reflects a shift from export-led growth toward domestic consumption, not a return to pre-reform levels. For years, Chinese officials have advocated rebalancing the economy away from export dependence and toward one driven by domestic consumption. A rising middle class now buys more of what China produces, reducing its reliance on international markets.

Explore more data on our Trade and Globalization page