Data Insights

Bite-sized insights on how the world is changing, published every few days.

Democracy

Honest elections matter to people everywhere

The image presents a horizontal bar chart illustrating the importance of having honest elections as expressed by respondents in various countries in 2022. Each bar represents a country and is color-coded to show the share of responses categorized as "Important" in blue, "Not important" in red, "Don't know" in gray, and "No answer" in black. 

The countries listed, from top to bottom based on their importance ratings, include Indonesia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Australia, India, Iran, Nigeria, Turkey, the United States, Brazil, Japan, Kenya, Egypt, Mexico, Russia, and Czechia. The majority of respondents from many countries indicate that having honest elections is important, with a significant number displaying uncertainty or deeming it not important.

Data source: Integrated Values Surveys (2024). Important responses include those categorized as "very important" and "rather important," while unimportant responses include "not very important" and "not at all important." The image is licensed under Creative Commons BY.

Honest elections matter because they give people a say in how their country is run. They help ensure that governments reflect the people's will and that policies respond to real needs.

It’s sometimes assumed that support for democracy and fair elections is limited to particular regions or cultures. However, data from the Integrated Values Surveys, which asks people across many countries how much honest elections matter to them, shows otherwise.

Across all the countries surveyed, large majorities said honest elections are important in their lives. Nearly everyone said so in Indonesia, South Korea, and the UK. Even in countries where experts judge elections as unfree or unfair — like Iran, Egypt, or Russia — around 80% to 90% still said they matter.

In some contexts, people may feel pressure to answer this question in a certain way, either downplaying or overstating the importance of elections. Still, the consistency of results across such different countries suggests the demand is real.

Explore more data on free and fair elections for all countries

Four countries that have successfully reversed democratic decline in recent years

The image displays a line chart titled "Autocratization can be turned around," which illustrates the liberal democracy index for four countries: Brazil, Poland, Thailand, and Zambia. The index ranges from 0 to 1, with 1 being the highest score.

The scores for each country decreased substantially between 2004 and 2024, but increased again afterwards.

The visual includes flags of each country next to their respective graphs. A footer provides the data source as V-Dem, dated 2025, and is credited under a Creative Commons BY license.

Several countries have recently managed to stop and even reverse the erosion of their democratic institutions.

The chart illustrates these turnarounds using the liberal democracy index from the Varieties of Democracy project. This index measures key aspects of democracy, such as the fairness of elections and checks on government power. It ranges from 0 (highly autocratic) to 1 (highly democratic).

The four countries in the chart all saw serious declines in democracy over the past 20 years—these declines are shown in red. In Thailand, democracy eroded quickly, while in Zambia, it happened more slowly.

Still, in each case, people resisted growing authoritarianism. As a result, these countries were able to partially or fully restore previous levels of liberal democracy.

These examples show that when democracy deteriorates, its fate is not sealed, and democratic institutions can be reclaimed.

Read more about how democratic decline has been reversed before in my article →

More than 80% of countries vote, but less than 40% do so freely and fairly

A horizontal bar graph titled "Many elections are not truly democratic," illustrating the share of countries worldwide that possessed various democratic features in 2022. Each bar represents a different feature, with the text beside them indicating the percentage of countries that had each one:

- Universal right to vote: 97%
- Elected parliament and government: 85%
- Multi-party elections: 82%
- Competitive elections: 63%
- Free expression and association: 39%
- All of the above: 37% (noted in red).

The footer credits the data source as "Skaaning et al. (2023)" with a "CC BY" license.

People might associate democracy with having the right to vote. But meaningful democracy is much more than that.

In 2022, nearly every country granted its citizens the right to vote. 85% of them had an elected parliament and government. In 82%, elections were multi-party, meaning that people had more than one option on the ballot. You can see this in the chart.

But, fewer than two-thirds of these elections were genuinely competitive. In others, voters were systematically pressured or intimidated, the timing of elections was violated, or election fraud influenced the results.

Even more concerning, in only 39% of countries were people able to express their political opinions and associate freely.

As a result, just over one-third of countries recently held elections that met all of these democratic criteria and can be considered truly free and fair.

Find out which countries have all democratic criteria and which don't

Democracy is still young in most countries considered democratic today

Bar chart titled "Number of electoral democracies by age, World, 2023". It categorizes political systems by type and age, based on the classification by Lührmann et al. (2018) and V-Dem data. Most democracies are less than a generation old, and few are older than three generations.

Most electoral democracies are younger than the oldest people who live in them.

The chart shows that almost two dozen democracies are younger than 18 — as young as the children in these countries. Others are only as old as their young adults. This is based on data from Regimes of the World.

In these younger democracies, most people have experienced life under authoritarian rule, and older people lacked democratic political rights for most of their lives.

A larger group of countries have been electoral democracies for one to three generations. In these countries, children and young adults have only known life in a democracy, but their parents and grandparents have experienced non-democratic rule.

Only ten countries have been democratic for more than 90 years. In these places, democracy is older than almost all of their citizens.

Read more in our article on the age of democracies →

Young people are less likely to vote than older people — often considerably so

Bar chart titled 'Young people are less likely to vote than older people.' The chart shows the share of people in each age group who voted in France (2022), the United Kingdom (2019), the United States (2020), and Germany (2021). Young people are less likely to vote than older people, often considerably so.

In many countries, there are large differences in voter turnout between young and older people. The chart shows the data for recent national elections in four countries.

In the 2022 French elections, 76% of those aged 18–24 voted, while 92% of people aged 50–59 did — a difference of 16 percentage points.

We see the same pattern in the UK and the US. Only slightly more than half of young people voted in their 2019 and 2020 elections, while around three out of four older people did.

This data comes from post-election surveys by Insee, the British Election Study, the US Census Bureau, and the Federal Returning Officer of Germany.

Explore more data on voter turnout around the world

One in five democracies is eroding

Stacked area chart showing the share of eroding democracies, stable democracies, and deepening democracies since 1900. Eroding democracies are at their highest level ever, at around 20% of all democracies.

Based on the Episodes of Regime Transformation data, this chart shows that around 20% of democracies were slowly deteriorating in 2023.

According to the underlying expert assessments by country experts, elections are becoming less meaningful, free, or fair in these countries.

This rate of democratic erosion is unprecedented.

This is partly because the data seeks to capture gradual declines in democratic institutions, while historically, democracies often broke down rapidly in coups d’état or foreign invasions.

So, while political rights are under threat in a substantial share of democracies, there is still time to act to halt this decline, restore democratic rights, and even deepen democratic institutions.

If you want to learn more, you can read my article on recent changes in democracy, for which we just updated the data.

The share of democracies has recently stagnated but remains near its historical high

Stacked area chart of the share of countries that are democracies and autocracies between 1973 and 2023. The share of closed autocracies decreases a lot over time, but recently increases. The share of liberal democracies decreases slightly over time, but recently decreases. The share of electoral democracies increases a lot and recently stagnates. The share of electoral autocracies increases over time.

Over the last twenty years, the share of countries that are democracies has remained relatively stable.

Relying on data from Varieties of Democracy, which we just updated, the chart shows that around half of all countries are democracies.

The world remains close to the historical high in the early 2000s and is much more democratic than 50 years ago; only 20% of countries were democracies in the early 1970s.

However, the chart shows smaller changes within democratic regimes: the share of liberal democracies, which grant additional individual and minority rights and constrain their governments, has decreased over the last decade.

While democracy has remained fairly resilient over the last few decades, this recent stagnation and limited rollback stresses that progress on increasing political rights is neither linear nor guaranteed.

Read more about the recent changes in democracy